Sunday, September 05, 2010

Home Equity - Latest Constitutional Amendments
11/26/2007

Mortgage Fraud
06/21/2007

Proposed Changes to Home Equity Lending in Texas
06/12/2007

Changes to Confidentiality Notice
03/29/2007

New Home Equity Court Ruling
10/12/2005

Survey of State Laws of Texas Pertaining to Residential Construction
09/28/2005

Home Equity Line of Credit and New Cure Provisions for Home Equity Lending
04/15/2004

Texas Constitution - Home Equity Loans
09/27/2003

Wage Liens Filed by the Texas Workforce Commission
07/03/2002

Borrower Termination of the Builder on a Residential Construction Loan
04/05/2002

Construction Retainage
03/02/2002

Origination Fees on Home Equity Loans
02/26/2002

Bridge Loans on Homestead
12/10/2001

Successful Construction Workout
11/05/2001

Contracting to Sell OREO Real Estate
10/05/2001

Residential Legal Descriptions
09/10/2001

7 TAC § 5.1  Home Disclosure Rule
09/01/2001

Landlord's Lien Subordination
08/03/2001

Clear Lot Inspections
08/03/2001

UCC Article 9 Law Changes
06/08/2001

Interim Construction Title Binder vs. Mortgagee Title Policy
05/03/2001

One Day Notice on Consumer Construction Loans
02/01/2001

Conveyance of Consumer's Lot to Builder
01/10/2001

Revised UCC Article 9
06/01/2000

Recent Legislation Affecting Residential Construction Loans to Consumers
09/01/1999

Disclosure Statement Required for Residential Construction Contract
09/01/1999

Mortgage Broker License Act
09/01/1999

Unique Aspects of Texas Property Law
01/01/1999

Texas Homestead
02/18/1998

RESPA Revisions
01/27/1998

No Cash-Out Refinances
01/15/1998

Home Improvement Loans
12/30/1997

Durable Powers of Attorney - Changes in the law
11/12/1997

Surveys
10/21/1997

Overview of Changes to Mechanics Lien Laws in Texas
07/14/1997

A Practical Analysis of the Home Equity Legislation
07/14/1997

Clear Lot Inspections
04/25/1997

 
 
   
 

The memoranda included herein are for informational purposes only, and are not intended as legal advice. Although the memoranda have been prepared by attorneys with this firm, they are not intended to constitute legal advice or legal opinions which may be relied upon. You should seek legal advice from your own attorney. No attorney-client relationship is intended with the dissemination of this information. The firm requires a written fee agreement to be executed prior to its acceptance of client representation or performance of legal services.

Bridge Loans on Homestead
12/10/2001

A customer is purchasing a new home but hasn’t yet sold the old home, nor has the customer moved out. He or she wants the lender to finance 100% of the purchase price of the new home, and take a lien on the equity in the old home.

What is a bridge loan?

A loan that provides bridge or temporary financing for a customer, usually as in the scenario presented above. The "bridge" is to provide 100% financing temporarily until the old home is sold and the loan will then be paid down to an agreed-upon loan to value based solely on the new residence.

So what’s the problem?

The problem is getting a valid lien on the old home without doing a home equity loan. Lenders want to keep it simple by doing one loan with a lien on each home. Additionally, a home equity loan can not exceed 80% of the fair market value of the homestead, nor can it be cross-defaulted or cross-pledged with another loan.

Why is the old home considered the homestead if the customer intends to move to the new home when the loan is closed?

Under Texas law, an existing property is deemed a homestead until (i) the property is abandoned as the homestead and, (ii) there is an intention to abandon. To meet the first requirement, there must be physical acts of abandonment. So technically, the old house is still the homestead until abandoned as such by the owner/borrower.

What acts of abandonment qualify?

It depends on the title company. Some require physical removal of all personal property, some require the moving trucks to be on site. Some require only that the house be listed for sale. Consult the title company for its requirements before approving the loan.

Should a Lender require title insurance on the lien on the old home?

It is recommended, as a real question of lien validity exists, since a lien other than a home equity lien would be invalid if the homestead has not been abandoned under the legal definition. Under Texas law it would be a deceptive trade practice for a lender to refuse to release a lien that it know or should have known was invalid.

Are there any special disclosure issues?

Some lenders have taken the position that a three day notice to cancel is required under the Reg Z, the federal truth-in-lending regulations. The Reg Z Commentary at 23(a)(1)4 states:

"Special rule for principal dwelling. Notwithstanding the general rule that consumers may have only the principal dwelling, when the consumer is acquiring or constructing a new principal dwelling, any loan subject to Regulation Z and secured by the equity in the consumer’s current principal dwelling (for example, a bridge loan) is subject to the right of rescission regardless of the purpose of that loan. For example, if a consumer whose principal dwelling is currently A builds B, to be occupied by the consumer upon completion of construction, a construction loan to finance B and secured by A is subject to the right of rescission. A loan secured by both A and B is, likewise, rescindable."

But a close reading of the commentary provision shows that the example of a bridge loan given is not the way lenders in Texas structure bridge loans, and thus, should not apply. Consult your attorney or compliance officer on this issue.

Is there any other way to structure a bridge loan?

Some lenders will take an assignment of net proceeds of the sale of the old home in lieu of a deed of trust lien. One problem with this is for the lender to track a sale; another problem is that the old house may not be sold in a timely manner. Also, proceeds of the sale of a homestead are exempt for a six month period. So if the homeowner claims the old house was the homestead at the time of assignment, the assignment would be invalid against the proceeds for at least the six month period.


 
 
Copyright © 2000-2007 The Davis Law Firm, P.C. Terms of Use
Unless noted, not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization